Industry heavy hitters and regulators spoke on a wide variety of bitcoin issues at a conference held at Bloomberg Global Headquarters in New York yesterday. Notably, however, the importance of regulation was the hot topic of the day.
The conference, titled ‘Bitcoin: Beyond the Currency’, drew an audience of roughly 200, many of whom were investors and denizens of Wall Street.
Former SEC chairman and recently appointed advisor to BitPay and Vaurum Arthur Levitt told the audience that there is a lot of work to be done on bitcoin’s image to take it into the mainstream.
“I think a lot of people in the industry think that mainline is something bad,” he said. “It isn’t – there are obvious ways you can do it and one way is to recognize that regulation isn’t in and of itself an evil word. It can be a stamp of acceptance, of approval, of having arrived.”
Other panelists echoed the concerns about bitcoin’s image problem, but also spoke much more positively about the role of the digital currency in financial services and other uses of the technology underlying bitcoin, the blockchain.
Bitcoin and the blockchain
The first panel, ‘Bitcoin as a Technology’, featured Chain CEO Adam Ludwin, BitGo CEO Will O’Brien, Ribbit Capital partner Nick Shalek and Blockchain president Peter Smith. Bloomberg Television tech reporter Alex Barinka moderated.
Ludwin kicked off intending to immediately dispel any notions that bitcoin and the blochchain could be separated, addressing the Goldman Sachs report on digital currencies issued earlier this year, which expressed interest in the blockchain, but not the digital currency. Smith called it a “fashionable” sentiment in the FinTech community right now.
“Everyone is building on both the blockchain and bitcoin. There are very, very few people separating even as you get into things like smart contracts, insurance types of proposals, legal or governance systems – you’re still fundamentally moving the most basic level of bitcoin around.”
He further pointed out that, while the world has previously had digital abundance and even infinity, the notion of digital scarcity was only introduced five years ago, by bitcoin and its units. Now that it’s here, he said, there can be digital money or digital value transfer. All outcomes of the flow of capital are wound up and bound to contracts.
“Once we combine digital scarcity with contracts, which are the programming language of this city – New York City runs on contracts … We can now begin to put that onto a public ledger that has perfect transparency, zero counterparty risk and ease of use that you just don’t get when you introduce very high-powered lawyers.”
In their closing remarks, each of the panelists mentioned regulation as at least one of their biggest concerns for the industry going forward.
Notably, O’Brien, too, said that the industry will be “fractionalized” by local regulators and local movements “dislodging” future innovations. While Shalek offered the opinion that the banks and the regulators will spend too much time waiting for the other to take the lead.
Eliminating ‘the human element’
Taking part in the ‘Payments and Service Providers’ panel were Circle co-founder and CTO Sean Neville, Stripe head of digital currencies Christian Anderson, BitPay co-founder and executive chairman Tony Gallippi and BitNet CEO John McDonnell. Bloomberg Intelligence senior financials analyst Alison Williams moderated.
Anderson said that it’s important to “tease apart” regulation and consumer protection, as it relates to “trust brands” – the ones that give consumers the confidence to use products and services.
Consumer protection, he said, can be accomplished without overabundantly regulating trust brands like Visa.
“Where the more interesting conversation is going to happen is around the concern of regulators that criminal activity is going to somehow run through these digital currencies.
The resolution to the regulatory conversation will be regulation that scales with the size and success of the business so it doesn’t interfere with innovation on the front end of the funnel.”
Evoking one of Ludwin’s points from the first panel, BitNet’s McDonnell said that the answer to consumer protection, money laundering, criminal activity or any other regulatory issue can be automated, calling it the recurring theme and the recurring answer throughout the community dialogue.
He spoke of the value of multi-signature transactions that have a service layer that eliminates the need for humans to imbed a smart contract or any other additional feature to do so.
He welcomed, and challenged, the dialogue around regulating technology, saying:
“Give us the regulation, give us the thing you need and we’ll figure out how to collect it – and we’ll do it in an automated fashion. It’s all about the technology, it’s all about automation, and it’s all about eliminating that human element.”
Regulation ‘an important factor’
While those on the opening technology panel seemed dubious about bitcoin’s regulatory outlook, the regulators themselves were more upbeat.
Coin Center executive director Jerry Brito moderated a panel that included Arthur Levitt, FinCEN director Jennifer Shasky Calvery, Delta Strategy Group founding partner James Newsome and Commodity Futures Trading Commissioner (CFTC) Mark P. Wetjen.
Levitt said that bitcoin has had many reputational issues and received the significant attention in terms of public events. The problem and challenge for the industry is more effectively defining what it does and what it will be doing 10 years from now – a definition that could turn public opinion in its favour.
“A bitcoin sounds diminutive,” he pointed out. “Cryptocurrency sounds mysterious.” Regulation, he added, is “a terribly important factor in terms of image and reputation.”
Levitt also said that his conversations with national regulators, while few, reveal “a real willingness and desire to learn [about] and understand” bitcoin.
For the CFTC, Wetjen said, the biggest issue with bitcoin is around surveillance. It’s important and necessary to understand the technology of bitcoin to understand how a swap execution facility and other similar platforms could abide by regulatory obligations.
He added that for, the time being, the CFTC isn’t singling out bitcoin especially, but that it’s looking at all asset classes per its usual responsibilities, adding:
“How can there be improvements fundamentally is a very, very healthy thing to be discussing, and again, just my entry into the bitcoin world has led to that.”
When asked how they envision the bitcoin landscape five years from now, the consensus was “evolved, accepted and regulated”.